




Episode 2: Release on 10/02
Episode 3: Release on 10/09
Episode 4: Release on 10/23
Episode 5: Release on 10/30
Episode 6: Release on 11/06
“Ross Ulbricht found himself at the intersection of three of the most highly prosecuted areas of law in the United States today: cyber, the drug war and financial regulation. Meaning the Silk Road angered a lot of people in power.”
– Alex Winter, Director of Deep Web
The following is based on public information sources, including court filings, transcripts, trial exhibits, affidavits, warrant applications, subpoenas, judicial rulings, investigation reports, press releases, sworn testimony and direct evidence. Some gaps remain due to government protective orders, redactions, sealed records, missing records the court cannot account for, dropped investigations, tampered evidence, communications and other data that remain encrypted, and the fact many of the parties involved have not testified.
Even so, every effort has been made to accurately present the available evidence surrounding the creation, investigation and shutdown of Silk Road, and the prosecution of Ross Ulbricht.

“Pay attention if you care about due process, Fourth Amendment protections against illegal searches, the limits of government surveillance and internet freedom.”
– Nick Gillespie, Editor-in-Chief, Reason
Initially, Ross asked Bates specific questions without revealing the nature of the project, but when Bates insisted, Ross told him about Silk Road. Bates offered him some help but distanced himself, citing concerns over the site being targeted by law enforcement.[2-3]
Then, on February 6, 2012, the new owner of Silk Road announced his screen name as “Dread Pirate Roberts” (DPR), a character from the film The Princess Bride, who passed his name and identity on to his successors.[2-9] By doing so, he became the focal point of the government’s investigation into Silk Road.

“This case is the birth of law as applied to our digital future. Watch it as a spectator at your peril.”
– Scott H. Greenfield, Criminal Defense Attorney

(illustration: Susie Cagle)
Der-Yeghiayan unearthed everything he could about Karpeles and his associates. He learned that Karpeles had acquired Mt. Gox around the time that Silk Road was started. Karpeles “had a strong motive to create a large underground marketplace where bitcoins would be in high demand. The Silk Road…was uniquely suited to his purpose…Because there are few legitimate vendors who accept bitcoins as payment, it is widely believed that the rise of Bitcoin has been driven in large part by their use on Silk Road.”[3-10]

(Reuters)
Der-Yeghiayan also managed to turn a confidential informant against Karpeles, someone who had worked for him “within the past two years.” This informant revealed that Karpeles owned and operated “bitcointalk.org—the same discussion forum where Silk Road was first publicized.” From visiting the forum Der-Yeghiayan knew “that [it] operate[d] on a software platform known as Simple Machines,” and “that this same software platform [was] used to operate the discussion forums included on the Silk Road.” He noted that “Simple Machine forum software was not widely used by forum administrators. Thus, the fact that the software [was] used to operate both the discussion forum on bitcointalk.org and…on Silk Road indicates that the forums were likely set up by the same administrator—that is, Karpeles.”[3-11]
By April 2012, Der-Yeghiayan had “identified multiple…accounts belonging to the Silk Road operators” that contained bitcoins worth “millions of U.S. dollars” and linked them back to Karpeles and one of his associates, Ashley Barr.[3-15] He had found “strong ties between those controlling the bitcoin markets and those operating the Silk Road.”[3-16] A Canadian with a Computer Science degree, Barr was Karpeles’s “right hand man.” He wrote like DPR and shared “the same viewpoints.”[3-17] For Der-Yeghiayan it clicked: Karpeles was “the mastermind behind keeping [Silk Road] secure and operating” and Barr was the spokesman and “voice” of DPR.[3-18] “We’re going right for the admin and his money,” he wrote in an April 20th email.[3-19]

(Reddit)
“Ross’s case is so important to our country’s future and the future of Liberty itself. When somebody has been singled out the way Ross has been, to be made an example of, for a purely political case, that’s a serious problem.”
– Jeffrey Tucker, Editorial Director, American Institute for Economic Research
At the meeting, Der-Yeghiayan told them that he had tracked down the Silk Road administrator, Mark Karpeles. Unbeknownst to Der-Yeghiayan, McFarland intended to co-opt his investigation into Karpeles and had informed C3 of his plans to “travel to [a] foreign country to interview [him].”[4-3]

(Twitter)
The following day, Steven Snyder, HSI Baltimore’s Certified Undercover (CUC) program manager, told Der-Yeghiayan that McFarland was once again trying to monopolize the Silk Road investigation, this time by registering it in Baltimore’s CUC program. Snyder refused to allow this “because it was clear to him that [McFarland] was copying [Der-Yeghiayan’s] case, and there could only be one CUC program over the target website.”[4-10] Yet, within a few weeks, Snyder reversed his decision and approved McFarland’s as the sole investigation, even though McFarland had been dropped by C3 from the CUC program the previous month.[4-11]
“This case isn’t about Silk Road, it is about the future of Internet freedom, autonomy, and privacy.”
– Carla Gericke, Candidate for New Hampshire Senate
Seven months into his Silk Road investigation, Bridges “went rogue” as McFarland would later call it, and secretly seized $2 million from Karpeles’s Wells Fargo account, which Karpeles was using in the operation of Mt. Gox.[5-3] Bridges did this to alert Karpeles that “the U.S. government had him on its radar”[5-4] and “the walls were closing in on them,” so they could avoid prosecution.[5-5] It is still unknown what involvement Bridges had with Karpeles in the preceding months, but Bridges issued “this seizure warrant…because he didn’t want a criminal case to proceed.” If the U.S. government obtained Mt. Gox records, “they might see his…name on them” and discover his misdeeds. Not surprisingly, two days before he seized Karpeles’s money, “he made sure to get his own money out.”[5-6]
Neither Der-Yeghiayan nor McFarland knew of the seizure because Bridges, in order to execute it, “went behind their back” to Richard Kay, an Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA) not associated with the Silk Road investigation.[5-7]
Force and Bridges also went after the bitcoins on Silk Road, but did so in secret so they could keep the money for themselves. According to Force, he pretended to be a drug smuggler for a cartel, gained DPR’s confidence and asked him to coordinate a large sale with one of Silk Road’s top cocaine vendors, a user going by the name “googleyed.” Allegedly, DPR tasked Curtis Green, one of his staff members, with setting up the deal. When approached by Green, googleyed was suspicious of Force’s offer and declined. Green agreed to accept delivery instead and gave Force his home address. There, a SWAT team arrested him once the package was delivered.[5-8][5-9]

(Forbes)

(Forbes)

(Ars Technica)
However, Bridges did not move the bitcoins directly from Silk Road. He first moved the funds to Green’s Silk Road administrative account. Bridges didn’t simply transfer “21,000 bitcoins out to steal them, he transferred them to…Green’s account…because he wanted to have a suspect. He wanted…Silk Road vendors and users to know ‘Here’s the person who stole my…bitcoins. It’s Curtis Green’.”[5-12]
Green then got pulled aside by an agent, who coaxed him to confess: “Come on. They’re the bad guys,” he told him.
“I…I wish I could,” Green kept saying. “It doesn’t make sense for me to steal the money, the bitcoins. If I was that type of person, why would I steal it the night that I am in front of 15 agents? I…wouldn’t I have done it the week before in the comfort of my home?” He couldn’t believe they were accusing him. “It made no…sense to me whatsoever…it blew my mind.”

(Linkedin)
It is unknown, however, if DPR was actually involved at all because the evidence for this entire incident came from Force himself after he and Bridges had infiltrated Silk Road. They had the ability to fabricate the whole thing. “When I saw the [murder-for-hire] transcripts,” Green said in a later interview, they were “[in line with Force’s] narrative, exactly what he portrayed. So was it there or did they put it there? I don’t know.”[5-16]
Another time, under the name “French Maid,” the two corrupt agents tried to sell DPR “information concerning the government’s investigation into the Silk Road.” Force, out of habit, signed one of his messages with his first name “Carl.” To cover this up, he later said his name was “Carla Sophia,” a Silk Road user with “many girlfriends and boyfriends on the site.”[5-18]
These and other schemes netted the pair at least 23,984 bitcoins, although it is unknown how many remain hidden.[5-19][5-20]
To be continued…
6. Thwarting Der-Yeghiayan
7. Being Wonderful
8. The Setup
9. Closing In
10. New York Takes Over
Ross was misused by the U.S. justice system, by those who took an oath to act with honor, integrity and support the Constitution. Instead, they won their trophy at the expense of a young man’s life. This cannot stand. Now Ross needs mercy from the President.
Please help us free Ross!
Sign Ross’s petition for clemency.
References
- ▲[1-1] – TorProject.org
- ▲[1-2] – Bitcoin.org
- ▲[1-3] – Ross’s appeal brief (page 13)
- ▲[1-4] – Ross’s sentencing letter addressed to Judge Forrest, May 22, 2015
- ▲[1-5] – Silk Road Seller’s Guide (page 5, trial exhibit 120)
- ▲[1-6] – Trial transcript, day 3 (page 462)
- ▲[1-7] – Legal categories listed on Silk Road as of October 1, 2013 (trial exhibit 132)
- ▲[1-8] – Wikipedia page (“Silk Road (marketplace)”)
- ▲[1-9] – Working paper by Nicolas Christin from Carnegie Mellon University (“Traveling the Silk Road: A measurement analysis of a large anonymous online marketplace,” page 12)
- ▲[1-10] – Gawker article, June 1, 2011 (“The Underground Website Where You Can Buy Any Drug Imaginable”)
- ▲[1-11] – CBS News article, June 29, 2011 (“Charles Schumer’s Wall Street Dance”)
- ▲[1-12] – NBC article, June 5, 2011 (“Schumer Pushes to Shut Down Online Drug Marketplace”)
- ▲[2-1] – Trial transcript, day 6 (page 1094)
- ▲[2-2] – Trial transcript, day 6 (page 1176)
- ▲[2-3] – Trial transcript, day 6 (page 1105)
- ▲[2-4] – Trial transcript, day 6 (page 1183)
- ▲[2-5] – Trial transcript, day 11 (page 2222)
- ▲[2-6] – Forbes interview, August 14, 2013 (“An Interview With A Digital Drug Lord: The Silk Road’s Dread Pirate Roberts”)
- ▲[2-7] – Trial transcript, day 6 (page 1138)
- ▲[2-8] – Trial transcript, day 6 (pages 1184-1185)
- ▲[2-9] – Trial transcript, day 2 (page 246)
- ▲[3-1] – Redacted Silk Road investigation report (appeal appendix page A847)
- ▲[3-2] – Trial transcript, day 1 (page 77)
- ▲[3-3] – Trial transcript, day 1 (page 98)
- ▲[3-4] – Jared Der-Yeghiayan’s affidavit in an email to Marc Krickbaum (appeal appendix page A774)
- ▲[3-5] – Trial Transcript, day 3 (page 465)
- ▲[3-6] – Jared Der-Yeghiayan’s affidavit in an email to Marc Krickbaum (appeal appendix page A776)
- ▲[3-7] – Jared Der-Yeghiayan’s affidavit in an email to Marc Krickbaum (appeal appendix page A777)
- ▲[3-8] – Jared Der-Yeghiayan’s affidavit in an email to Marc Krickbaum (appeal appendix page A778)
- ▲[3-9] – Jared Der-Yeghiayan’s affidavit in support of a search warrant for Mark Karpeles (appeal appendix page A798)
- ▲[3-10] – Jared Der-Yeghiayan’s affidavit in support of a search warrant for Mark Karpeles (appeal appendix page A801)
- ▲[3-11] – Jared Der-Yeghiayan’s affidavit in support of a search warrant for Mark Karpeles (appeal appendix page A799)
- ▲[3-12] – Screenshot of Tuxtelecom homepage source code, Wayback Marchine, February 3, 2012 (showing “MediaWiki 1.17”)
- ▲[3-13] – Jared Der-Yeghiayan’s affidavit in support of a search warrant for Mark Karpeles (appeal appendix page A800)
- ▲[3-14] – Jared Der-Yeghiayan’s affidavit in support of a search warrant for Mark Karpeles (appeal appendix page A797)
- ▲[3-15] – Excerpt from Jared Der-Yeghiayan’s report, 3500 material (exhibit 1 from Declaration of Joshua Dratel in Support of Ross’s Post-Trial Motions, 3505-3122-24, page 4)
- ▲[3-16] – Excerpt from Jared Der-Yeghiayan’s report, 3500 material (exhibit 1 from Declaration of Joshua Dratel in Support of Ross’s Post-Trial Motions, 3505-3122-24, page 4)
- ▲[3-17] – Trial transcript, day 3 (pages 489-491)
- ▲[3-18] – Trial transcript, day 3 (page 495)
- ▲[3-19] – Excerpt from Jared Der-Yeghiayan’s email, 3500 material (exhibit 1 from Declaration of Joshua Dratel in Support of Ross’s Post-Trial Motions, 3505-537, page 2)
- ▲[3-20] – Redacted Silk Road investigation report (appeal appendix page A849)
- ▲[4-1] – Redacted Silk Road investigation report (appeal appendix page A849)
- ▲[4-2] – Redacted Silk Road investigation report (appeal appendix page A849)
- ▲[4-3] – Redacted Silk Road investigation report (appeal appendix page A849)
- ▲[4-4] – Trial transcript, day 3 (page 491)
- ▲[4-5] – Redacted Silk Road investigation report (appeal appendix page A849)
- ▲[4-6] – Trial transcript, day 3 (page 492)
- ▲[4-7] – Redacted Silk Road investigation report (appeal appendix page A849)
- ▲[4-8] – Trial transcript, day 3 (page 507)
- ▲[4-9] – Redacted Silk Road investigation report (appeal appendix page A850)
- ▲[4-10] – Redacted Silk Road investigation report (appeal appendix page A850)
- ▲[4-11] – Redacted Silk Road investigation report (appeal appendix page A849)
- ▲[4-12] – Redacted Silk Road investigation report (appeal appendix page A850)
- ▲[4-13] – Redacted Silk Road investigation report (appeal appendix page A850)
- ▲[5-1] – Force/Bridges criminal complaint (page 14)
- ▲[5-2] – Shaun Bridges’s sentencing transcript (page 19)
- ▲[5-3] – Redacted Silk Road investigation report (appeal appendix page A851)
- ▲[5-4] – Trial transcript, day 3 (page 497)
- ▲[5-5] – Trial transcript, day 1 (page 61)
- ▲[5-6] – Shaun Bridges’s sentencing transcript (page 21)
- ▲[5-7] – Redacted Silk Road investigation report (appeal appendix page A851)
- ▲[5-8] – Curtis Green’s plea agreement (page 10)
- ▲[5-9] – Reply Memorandum of Law in support of Ross’s Post-Trial Motions (page 55)
- ▲[5-10] – Shaun Bridges’s sentencing transcript (page 25)
- ▲[5-11] – Force/Bridges criminal complaint (page 5)
- ▲[5-12] – Shaun Bridges’s sentencing transcript (page 23)
- ▲[5-13] – Shaun Bridges’s sentencing transcript (page 26)
- ▲[5-14] – Shaun Bridges’s sentencing transcript (page 29)
- ▲[5-15] – Force/Bridges criminal complaint (pages 42-43)
- ▲[5-16] – Curtis Green Interview, The Crypto Show, August 9, 2018 (“Never Before Heard Information About The Silk Road by Silk Road Admin Curtis Green and Promether,” 55m28s)
- ▲[5-17] – Reply Memorandum of Law in support of Ross’s Post-Trial Motions (page 57)
- ▲[5-18] – Carl Mark Force’s plea agreement (page 5)
- ▲[5-19] – Carl Mark Force’s plea agreement
- ▲[5-20] – Shaun Bridges’s sentencing transcript

