In April of 2015, just seven weeks after Ross’s trial concluded, it was revealed that two federal agents at the core of the Silk Road investigation—DEA agent Carl Force and Secret Service agent Shaun Bridges—were charged with corruption directly related to their involvement in Silk Road.
It was later disclosed that Bridges was working for the NSA during this time.The agents also went after the bitcoins on Silk Road. According to Force, they tricked Curtis Green, a senior Silk Road admin, into accepting a controlled delivery of cocaine. When Green gave them his address, the agents arrested him. During his interrogation, Green revealed how to exploit Silk Road’s system, change passwords and take over accounts. Bridges then used Green’s account to hijack and empty the accounts of top Silk Road vendors.According to Force, DPR was duped into believing that Green was behind the theft. DPR supposedly asked Force, who was posing as a cartel member, to track Green down and get the money back. Force agreed and pretended to catch and kill Green. No bitcoins were recovered.
Bridges’s specialty was in “computer forensics and anonymity software derived from Tor.” He was “the Task Force’s subject matter expert in Bitcoin.” So, Force was “assisted in his illegal, unauthorized infiltration and manipulation of the Silk Road website by a computer forensics agent with expertise in anonymity and Bitcoin.” – Dratel arguing for a new trial.
The “prosecution of Force shed light on his “capacity for fraud, deception, forgery, abuse of his government authority and access–including predatory and retaliatory conduct and false accusations against innocent persons– and inventing complex, layered cover stories to conceal his misdeeds.” – Joshua Dratel arguing for a new trial once Force and Bridges’s corruption was revealed.
With Green’s “administrator” privileges, Force and Bridges “could have reset the PIN on DPR’s account and usurped control of it,” even “without DPR losing access.” They could have “changed anything in the Silk Road database, including message text in the Forum or Market,” all without “the government’s knowledge of what they did.” – Joshua Dratel arguing for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.
- ▲ – Force/Bridges criminal complaint
- ▲ – Shaun Bridges sentencing script (page 19)
- ▲ – Reply Memorandum of Law in support of Ross’s post-trial motions (page 55)
- ▲ – Force/Bridges criminal complaint (page 5)
- ▲ – Force/Bridges criminal complaint (page 42)
- ▲ – Appeal brief (page 34)
- ▲ – Appeal brief (page 18)
- ▲ – Appeal brief (page 23)
- ▲ – Shaun Bridges sentencing script (page 14)
- ▲ – Appeal brief (page 35)
- ▲ – Reply Memorandum of Law in support of Ross’s post-trial motions (page 3)
- ▲ – Reply Memorandum of Law in support of Ross’s post-trial motions (page 36)