The Case, The Goal and Why this Matters
The Federal government claims that Ross Ulbricht created and operated the anonymous online marketplace Silk Road, under the pseudonym Dread Pirate Roberts (DPR). Although law enforcement shut down the Silk Road site Oct. 2 after arresting Ross, DPR posted on the Silk Road forum six days later and the Silk Road site was up and running again about a month later and is still today.
Ross has been arraigned in New York on a superseding indictment, where he has pleaded not guilty to all charges. The counts are narcotics trafficking; computer hacking; money laundering; engaging in a criminal enterprise; and conspiracy to traffic in fraudulent IDs.
The case is scheduled to be tried beginning November 10 in Judge Forrest’s courtroom, #15A, Daniel Patrick Moynihan
Courthouse, 500 Pearl St., New York, NY.
Although initially alleged to have planned six murders, Ross was not indicted in New York for any. It also failed to include the one charge remaining in the Maryland indictment, which is a year old and possibly in violation of the right to a speedy trial. Joshua Dratel, Ross’ attorney, believes that the absense of the Maryland charge demonstrates that the allegation has no merit. Otherwise the prosecution would have indicted Ross for this. Basically the prosecution wants its cake and eat it too: smear Ross’ reputation without having to prove anything.
Despite not charging Ross on two different occasions, the prosecution used the murder-for-hire allegations to argue against bail. In addition, no victim is named in the prosecution’s complaint or the New York indictment, and the FBI affidavit states that there is no record of any actual homicide.
(Note: The murder-for-hire allegation is now an “uncharged crime” mentioned in the narcotics trafficking count of the New York Indictment. It is NOT a formal charge and, unlike an indictment, requires NO PROOF. The defense has requested that the court have it removed, as it is prejudicial and irrelevant to the charges).
This case will set precedent for the 21st century and pave the way for new law and interpretations that could impact the future and freedom of the Internet.
This case opens new legal territory and the government is poised to set Internet and financial law with it. Bad law could be ushered in and we will be forced to live with it.
- If Ulbricht is convicted, it opens the door for the censure and erosion of a free Internet. Under present law, website hosts are not held responsible in civil cases for illegal actions on their sites. This case could set precedent and open the door for criminal liability for web hosts.
- A US citizen’s constitutional rights are being violated with vague allegations that do not cite specific crimes, a violation of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments of the Bill of Rights. In addition, his Fourth Amendment rights have been violated with illegal warrants and searches and seizures lacking any warrant. If the government can misapply the law against Ulbricht, it can do it to any of us.
- In its documents, the government equates the desire for privacy (use of Tor for example) with criminal intent.
- This case represents the first challenge to the government’s attempt to expand the money laundering statute to include digital currency.
Please see http://freeross.org/category/documents/ for further explanation.
- To protect individual freedom and privacy;
- To provide Ross with what every American citizen is promised: a fair trial.
- To have Ross acquitted of all charges.
We are working hard with the best legal team to defend Ross, but are up against the full force of the federal government. We are not the family of a wealthy kingpin. We own no bitcoin. We are regular people taking on a giant fight against a Goliath. It will take much more money than we have.